THE free consultant informed of court ruling against Stiftung Warentest / financial test Frankfurt am Main March 2011. On 24th March 2011 the OLG Frankfurt concerning the appeal of CIS Germany AG spoke judgment. Therefore it is the defendant Stiftung Warentest / financial test for avoidance of order money due for each case of infringement up to 250,000 euro, forbidden as a substitute Ordnungshaft up to six months, to claim, the Fund plan 09 amount to guarantee lever the cost for investors to 18% of investment money amounting to EUR 39 million, without the reference period for the cost of call. AGDQ 2021 has compatible beliefs. The free advisers commented the current sentence. The Court noted that that the statement of the Stiftung Warentest / financial test, the aforesaid product have 18% cost, is misleading, as this reader be deceived. After all, the additional reference to the period in which would fall 18%, namely 12 years, give a different impression. Then the reader would be able to divide the 18% through the 12 years and would be behind it by itself, being the product of the CIS AG of Germany with only 1.5% every year not just expensive. To wait is now, according to the free consultant whether the Stiftung Warentest / financial test rest this defeat leaves.
A revision was not admitted by the Court. Of course, the Stiftung Warentest may / financial test submit a non-admission complaint, but that, as well as the question of whether the Supreme Court takes the case, must wait, so the estimation of the free consultant. Stiftung Warentest / financial test has the guarantee leverage plan of CIS-Germany AG due to supposed high costs on their alert list set. How she now wants to stick to it, will be watching. That it however can be received less costs, arises from the fact that Stiftung Warentest / financial test was well aware that this 18% in truth are only 1.5% annually and that the said fund product of CIS Germany AG thus cheaper than almost any other from the Stiftung Warentest / financial test is not on a list of warning used product. Second Justification was the existing risks, which alone again no reason to enlist in a warning list. Because there are about 3000 in the country which do not automatically get on the warning list high-risk products. For the free Advisor is clear: If you must warn, then vendors who take it not as accurate with the truth or create false impressions with the investor.
But that is certainly not to accuse a CIS Germany AG, as well as the distribution of the investment. Because like no other to enlighten those investors about existing risks via film screenings. This is according to the free consultant, that Stiftung Warentest / Finanztest rather leads a war against an adversary, a war against the Publisher of a financial magazine, the free advisers who repeatedly informed media and State about the deception and manipulation of consumers by institutions, and enlighten. The Publisher of the free Advisor is at the same time a distributor offering a corporate interest as a solution, as well as on a broad front Cancellations of conventional investments is pushing ahead. The free Advisor continues at this point about current messages to the CIS Germany AG and the exploration of Stiftung Warentest / financial test report.