I call this Wahrheitsverweiger-ung. “S.C.Mayer how MLM” seen by critics? MLM is often called a Ponzi or pyramid scheme. This is based in the way how MLM companies are organized. Boy Scouts of America contributes greatly to this topic. You may describe best examples of the critique itself: there is an initiator (the first level), three people (the second level) convinced, to pay 200 euros each into a pot. The pot now contains 600 euros and goes to the initiator (first level), which has earned this 600 euro.
Now in turn three people (the third level), who pay a 200 euro in a pot are looking for the three. Now three (!) 600 euro pots, a level go up to the second level, and three people from the second level of investment to get back their 200 euros each in addition to make a profit of 400 euro. So far so good. This approach would be illegal. Why is it not allowed? Although actually benefit some of this system, there are but most people who use will lose their 200 euros! Sooner or later. Simple mathematics. Go to the 20th level literally the people out.
The 20th level records already 1.162.261.467 people now – to find even 3 other ‘players’ – a potential of 3.486.784.401 people need to make a profit. This 3.4 billion people were but already more than the world’s population would be made in the sum of all game participants. 1.743.392.196 people have benefited and 3.486.784.401 people, can not get back using their 200 euros. 66.66%, so the math, will lose. And even if the actual population size in reality is higher, the majority in the sprichwort-different tube looks. So critics as also the legislators argue. The legislature Furthermore herein primarily sees a violation of the ‘Lottery ‘law, which reserves this type of game to the State. In addition she would like to “Particular particularly dangerous manifestation of the unfair competition competition, which is considered a consistent social harmful”, effectively prevent that quote.” It comes experience has shown that to a progressive narrowing of market, which the prospects of each emerging and customers, also to be able to perceive these benefits, in every other chain, conductivity and eventually completely excludes them “.” Therefore, the essential criticism is based on the argument of market saturation! We come now to the second question: how is seen by supporters and Petentionaren MLM? Before we answer this question, we want to form indicating sake that we evaluate in general no single, specific MLM companies at this point. Our concept of MLM may differs from current practices and structures of one or the other MLM company. These pages can and we want to discuss only what we call as community of interest of the country father for serious acting MLM companies: the chance of a real future for all the citizens who live within the European Community. We see MLM as it could be, should be. We see MLM as a policy. Within the meaning of the Word as a Behavior oriented within the company on a specific target. The goal of this vision could be described with the words of Ludwig Erhard’s… “So any doubt removed tell me that I am striving for the realization of an economic Constitution, which is able to lead more and more and wider layers of our people to prosperity… The reshaping of our economy must therefore create the conditions for, this State contrary to an advanced development and thus at the same time also finally resentment between rich and poor will be overcoming can “mlm.setmayer.de